September 26, 2024 — SSoS District Communication
May 13, 2024 — SSoS District Communication
March 1, 2024 — FY25 District Instructional Prioritization Submission Guidance
January 5, 2024 — SSoS District Communication
October 27, 2023 — SSoS District Communication
September 22, 2023 — Post-Accountability SSoS District Communication
September 21, 2023 — CSDP District Assistance Communication
August 14, 2023 — SSOS District Communication
May 15, 2023 — SSOS District Communication
March 1, 2023 — District Prioritization Submission Guidance
December 22, 2022 — Important Dates, January through June (email)
December 22, 2022 — SSoS Calendar — January–June (word doc)
December 14, 2022 — School Year 2022-23 Progress Monitoring Update (email)
October 18, 2022 — SSoS District Communication
September 30, 2022 — District Communication After 2022 Accountability Data Release
SSoS-District Partnership Overview
SSoS Calendar SY2023-2024
FY25 District Instructional Prioritization Guidance
FY25 District Instructional Prioritization Template
March 6, 2020 — Narrated Overview on the Sustainable Improvement Process
SSoS is in the process of updating and aligning our School Improvement Plan (SIP) guidance with the Coherence Guidebook. We encourage districts and schools to reference those resources while engaging in the school planning process outlined below.
To develop a high-quality sustainable improvement plan, schools should gather meaningful input from an array of key stakeholders, incorporate that input into their plan, and continue to regularly share progress with and elicit input from stakeholders as the plan is implemented.
Districts and schools engaging in rapid school improvement and in the state's Planning for Success process tell us that soliciting input from an array of stakeholders:
Administrators and teachers from the South End Middle School in Springfield, MA, share their experience in engaging in this process in one of the latest videos in DESE's Turnaround Practices in Achievement Gain Schools Video Series.
Generally speaking, stakeholders serve an advisory role by offering their perspectives, feedback, and broad recommendations on how to build on the school's strengths and challenges. Their input informs the work of the school team charged with developing the sustainable improvement plan, and provides insight and input throughout the implementation of the plan. The role of stakeholders may vary depending on existing relationships between the school and different stakeholder groups.
While stakeholders generally serve an advisory role, it is important to determine who at the school and district level will lead the work by serving on the school's sustainable improvement planning and implementation team - a group of school and district staff that will be most affected by the anticipated changes in the school. This could be a team that already exists in the school, like an Instructional Leadership Team (ILT), or may need to be developed with new staff. Establishing a sustainable improvement planning team early on is an essential step in the sustainable improvement planning process. Team members should be informed of the intense nature of the work involved in sustainable improvement planning and they should be willing to make the commitment to this process. This work will most likely need to involve after school, evening and/or weekend meetings to complete the sustainable improvement planning process. Most importantly, the sustainable improvement planning team should be the entity that drives the implementation of the sustainable improvement plan, supporting school and district leadership in monitoring school progress, and making mid-course corrections.
Among the team members there should be individuals who are strong in areas of literacy, math and science instruction, other key instructional areas (e.g. special education, English language learning), data analysis, technology, communication, community engagement, team building, and student services. The size of the team should be relative to the size of the school. For example, a small elementary school may decide to have only 8 members. A secondary school may have 12-14 members. Groups larger than 20 members may be too large for the core team. Sub-committees may be needed as planning intensifies. As the plan progresses, it may be necessary to make adjustments to team membership to ensure the right people are involved to support successful implementation.
The specific stakeholders your school engages will depend on the unique context of your school community. Seek out individuals who can serve as champions and critical friends, who bring diverse skills and perspectives, and who serve the school in a variety of capacities. The number of stakeholders convened at any time should be large enough to include an array of perspectives, but small enough for all stakeholders to make meaningful contributions to the process. Think about the students who your school serves and make certain that they are well represented in the stakeholder engagement process so that they can speak authentically to their perspectives and needs, particularly those who have been historically marginalized (African American/Black, Hispanic/Latino, English learners, students with disabilities, etc.).
Examples of some of the resources and protocols that SSoS Regional Assistance Teams frequently use with districts and schools they support appear in the Additional Resources at the end of this section.
Flexible Format Submission
Describe the following:
While not required, these resources may be helpful as your school engages in this stage of the sustainable improvement planning process:
Sample Stakeholder Engagement Worksheet
Instructional Leadership Teams Project: Resources, articles, and protocols to help establish and act on a shared understanding of implementing and monitoring continuous improvement with ILTs.
State law requires that schools designated as underperforming assemble a group of stakeholders that meet specific criteria and under specific timelines. Underperforming schools only should use this resource in addition to the guidance above to ensure compliance with state law.
LSG Guidance for Underperforming Schools
Last Updated: September 30, 2024
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 135 Santilli Highway, Everett, MA 02149
Voice: (781) 338-3000 TTY: (800) 439-2370
Disclaimer: A reference in this website to any specific commercial products, processes, or services, or the use of any trade, firm, or corporation name is for the information and convenience of the public and does not constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.