Security Portal
|
School Profiles
Administration and Finance
Accounting and Auditing
Chapter 70 Program
Chapter 74 Nonresident Tuition
Charter Finance and Enrollment
DESE Budget
Federal Grant Programs
Food and Nutrition
Grants/Funding Opportunities
Inter-District School Choice
Regional Districts
School Buildings
School Finance Regulations
Special Ed. Circuit Breaker
Transportation
Commissioner's Office
Back to School
Commissioner's Update
Special Advisories
Strategic Plan
Superintendents' Checklist
District Support
Accountability Lists, Materials, and Tools
Approved Special Education Schools
Boston Public Schools Systemic Improvement Plan (SIP)
Chronically Underperforming Schools and Districts
Data and Accountability
District Review Documentation
District Review Reports
Federal Reports
Language Access
Leadership and Governance (Toolkit)
Leading Educational Access Project (LEAP)
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS)
Public School Monitoring
School and District Profiles
School and District Report Cards
Special Education
Special Education in Institutional Settings
Statewide System of Support
Student Opportunity Act
Educational Options
Adult and Community Learning Services
Alternative Education
Career Technical Education (CTE)
Charter Schools
College Career, and Technical Education
Commonwealth Virtual Schools
Dropout Prevention and Reengagement
Early College
Educational Collaboratives
Family Portal
High School Equivalency (HSE)
Home Schooling
Innovation Career Pathways
Inter-District School Choice
Mass Academy of Math and Science at WPI
METCO
Problem Resolution System
Public School Districts
Recovery High Schools
School Finder
School Redesign
Student and Family Support
Instructional Support
Acceleration Roadmap
Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Practices
CURATE
Educator Effectiveness
Educator Evaluation
Educator Licensure
Educator Preparation
Educator Recognition
English Learner Education
Equitable Access
Induction and Mentoring
Instructional Materials
Learning Standards
Literacy and Humanities
Mass Literacy
MTEL
PAL
Professional Development
Professional Learning
RETELL
Social and Emotional Learning
STEM
Talent Guide
Teacher Leadership
World Languages
Kaleidoscope Collective
What is Deeper Learning?
Planning for Deeper Learning
Legal
Arbitration Awards
Federal Laws
Legal Advisories
Litigation Reports
State Laws
State Regulations
Planning and Research
Planning for Success
Research and Evaluation
Resource Allocation
Strategic Initiatives
DEI Policies and Practices at DESE
Diverse Workforce
Equitable Student Access
Student Assessment
ACCESS for ELLs
AP Subsidy Program
Graduation Requirements
John and Abigail Adams Scholarship
MCAS
MCAS Accessibility and Accommodations
MCAS Alternate Assessment
MCAS Grade-Level and Competency Portfolio
National/International Tests
Parent/Guardian Information
Performance Appeals
Stanley Z. Koplik Award
Training Opportunities
Why Testing Matters
COVID-19 Information
Board of Education
News and Media
Data and Accountability
Family Portal
Educators and Administrators
Public Awareness Campaigns
Most Requested
Licensure
Learning Standards
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
MTEL
Most Requested:
Licensure
Learning Standards
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
MTEL
Adult and Community Learning Services (ACLS)
Accountability System
ACLS Services
Adult Education Policies
Adult Education Program Directory
Assessment
Curriculum and Instruction
Educator Effectiveness
Current Funding Opportunities
Previous Funding Opportunities
High School Equivalency (HSE)
LACES Student Data Management System Information
Mailings
MassLINKS
MassSTEP
Professional Development
Related Links/Resources
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA)
ACLS Staff
Student Ambassadors
FY19 Perkins IV Corrections RFP Q&A
Thursday, August 16, 2018
Q1:
Will each reader read the entire Part III of the grant or will each be assigned a different question? I am wondering this to determine how much repetition needs to be made in the response.
A1:
Each reader will read the entire application submitted.
Q2:
I just wanted to confirm from the question answered at the bidders conference that it would be allowable to submit a 17.59% indirect cost rate within the budget, as that rate is assigned to us by the Office of the State Comptroller.
A2:
If a federal grant program has a more restrictive indirect cost rate than the rate assigned by the Comptroller's Office, then the more restrictive rate applies since that is dictated by the federal award requirement. Perkins is quite clear that admin and indirect combined cannot exceed 5%. Applicants will have to ask for a waiver from ANF to apply the lower indirect costs on these grants. Use the 5% indirect cost restriction in the grant RFP as justification. You may email Karen DeCoster for a waiver form if you do not have one at
kdecoster@doe.mass.edu
.
Q3:
In the required program information, under PROGRAM DESIGN we are asked to: Submit a program
scope and sequence chart and/or syllabus that provides sufficient detail regarding the size, scope, and quality of the program.
Does our response require us to provide details regarding the hours that students will attend each class?
A3:
"Sufficient detail" re: the
size
of the program should include information about program intensity, which would include the days per week and the time duration for each class/course.
Q4:
Will the list of potential applicants that submitted a letter of intent (LOI) be published?
A4:
Yes, please find the list below. It should be noted that LOIs are not required and do not obligate an applicant to apply. In other words, the final list of applicants may not include everyone listed below.
Barnstable CHOC
Berkshire CHOC
Department of Youth Services
Essex CHOC
Franklin CHOC
Hampden CHOC
MA Department of Corrections
Middlesex CHOC
Plymouth CHOC
School of Re-entry, Boston Pre-Release
Suffolk CHOC
Worcester CHOC
Questions submitted week of 8/20/2018
Q5:
I noticed that the criteria shown in the
rubric
for question 2 does not entirely match the criteria in the question re:
Outcomes and Professional Development
. There is no mention of professional development. Was this an error?
A5:
Yes, this was an error. The rubric has been updated and reposted to include: "Describe the professional development that will be provided to program staff and
how
such professional development supports one or more the outcomes above."
Q6:
Is Question 7 asking us to describe how we will "support and sustain" the program [itself] or, considering its reference to the Statement of Assurances, is the question asking how we intend to support the students who are embedded in the program? Or both?
A6:
The narrative prompt 7 is referring to the program. As stated, the response "should include, but is not limited to, how the agency will assist the program in fully meeting any Perkins requirement deemed to be partially in place in the Statement of Assurances."
Q7:
Can labor market information be attached as an Appendix?
A7:
Yes, but it will count toward the page limit.
Questions submitted week of 8/27/2018
Q8:
Narrative prompt 5 asks for a lesson plan. Our lesson plan is five pages in length. Will those pages be counted as part of the 20-page narrative or can it be treated as an exhibit/attachment?
A8:
Yes, the lesson plan will count toward the page limit. Consider submitting lesson plan excerpts to conserve pages. If you wish to submit a sample lesson as an exhibit (attachment) you may print 2 pages side-by- side on one page, as long as it can be easily read.
Q9:
At the bidders' conference, you mentioned that the statement of assurance (SOA) would be revised to include an end of year report
in addition
to a mid-year report. The statement of assurance that is posted has not been changed. Was this an oversight?
A9:
No. The revision to the SOA will only be made to the final version that awardees must submit in Ed Grants.
Q10:
Do you need job descriptions and resumes for people who are not being funded by the project but will be working in coordination with the project? Or just for people being funded by the project?
A10:
Resumes and job descriptions are to be submitted for everyone on the grant, including those shown on a submitted match budget (which is optional).
Last Updated: August 31, 2018