Standards Map

English Language Arts and Literacy > Grade 11-12 > Reading in Science and Career and Technical Subjects

Accessibility Mode: Note: You are viewing this information in accessibility mode. To view the map, enlarge your window or use a larger device.

English Language Arts and Literacy | Grade : 11-12

Strand - Reading in Science and Career and Technical Subjects

Cluster - Integration of Knowledge and Ideas

[RCA-ST.11-12.8] - Evaluate the hypotheses, data, analysis, and conclusions in a science or technical text, verifying the data when possible and corroborating or challenging conclusions with other sources of information.


Resources:



Predecessor Standards:

  • RCA-ST.9-10.8
    Assess the extent to which the reasoning and evidence in a text support the author’s claim or a recommendation for solving a scientific or technical problem.

Successor Standards:

No Successor Standards found.

Same Level Standards:

  • HS.PHY.4.1
    Use mathematical representations to support a claim regarding relationships among the frequency, wavelength, and speed of waves traveling within various media. Recognize that electromagnetic waves can travel through empty space (without a medium) as compared to mechanical waves that require a medium. Clarification Statements: Emphasis is on relationships when waves travel within a medium, and comparisons when a wave travels in different media. Examples of situations to consider could include electromagnetic radiation traveling in a vacuum and glass, sound waves traveling through air and water, and seismic waves traveling through the Earth. Relationships include v = λf, T = 1/f, and the qualitative comparison of the speed of a transverse (including electromagnetic) or longitudinal mechanical wave in a solid, liquid, gas, or vacuum. State Assessment Boundary: Transitions between two media are not expected in state assessment.
  • HS.PHY.4.3
    Evaluate the claims, evidence, and reasoning behind the idea that electromagnetic radiation can be described by either a wave model or a particle model, and that for some situations involving resonance, interference, diffraction, refraction, or the photoelectric effect, one model is more useful than the other. Clarification Statement: Emphasis is on qualitative reasoning and comparisons of the two models. State Assessment Boundary: Calculations of energy levels or resonant frequencies are not expected in state assessment.