Security Portal
|
School Profiles
Administration and Finance
Accounting and Auditing
Chapter 70 Program
Chapter 74 Nonresident Tuition
Charter Finance and Enrollment
DESE Budget
Federal Grant Programs
Food and Nutrition
Grants/Funding Opportunities
Inter-District School Choice
Regional Districts
School Buildings
School Finance Regulations
Special Ed. Circuit Breaker
Transportation
Commissioner's Office
Back to School
Commissioner's Update
Special Advisories
Strategic Plan
Superintendents' Checklist
District Support
Accountability Lists, Materials, and Tools
Approved Special Education Schools
Boston Public Schools Systemic Improvement Plan (SIP)
Chronically Underperforming Schools and Districts
Data and Accountability
District Review Documentation
District Review Reports
Federal Reports
Language Access
Leadership and Governance (Toolkit)
Leading Educational Access Project (LEAP)
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS)
Public School Monitoring
School and District Profiles
School and District Report Cards
Special Education
Special Education in Institutional Settings
Statewide System of Support
Student Opportunity Act
Educational Options
Adult and Community Learning Services
Alternative Education
Career Technical Education (CTE)
Charter Schools
College Career, and Technical Education
Commonwealth Virtual Schools
Dropout Prevention and Reengagement
Early College
Educational Collaboratives
Family Portal
High School Equivalency (HSE)
Home Schooling
Innovation Career Pathways
Inter-District School Choice
Mass Academy of Math and Science at WPI
METCO
Problem Resolution System
Public School Districts
Recovery High Schools
School Finder
School Redesign
Student and Family Support
Instructional Support
Acceleration Roadmap
Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Practices
CURATE
Educator Effectiveness
Educator Evaluation
Educator Licensure
Educator Preparation
Educator Recognition
English Learner Education
Equitable Access
Induction and Mentoring
Instructional Materials
Learning Standards
Literacy and Humanities
Mass Literacy
MTEL
PAL
Professional Development
Professional Learning
RETELL
Social and Emotional Learning
STEM
Talent Guide
Teacher Leadership
World Languages
Kaleidoscope Collective
What is Deeper Learning?
Planning for Deeper Learning
Legal
Arbitration Awards
Federal Laws
Legal Advisories
Litigation Reports
State Laws
State Regulations
Planning and Research
Planning for Success
Research and Evaluation
Resource Allocation
Strategic Initiatives
DEI Policies and Practices at DESE
Diverse Workforce
Equitable Student Access
Student Assessment
ACCESS for ELLs
AP Subsidy Program
Graduation Requirements
John and Abigail Adams Scholarship
MCAS
MCAS Accessibility and Accommodations
MCAS Alternate Assessment
MCAS Grade-Level and Competency Portfolio
National/International Tests
Parent/Guardian Information
Performance Appeals
Stanley Z. Koplik Award
Training Opportunities
Why Testing Matters
COVID-19 Information
Board of Education
News and Media
Data and Accountability
Family Portal
Educators and Administrators
Public Awareness Campaigns
Most Requested
Licensure
Learning Standards
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
MTEL
Most Requested:
Licensure
Learning Standards
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
MTEL
For Immediate Release
Thursday, April 3, 2008
Contact:
Heidi Guarino 781-338-3106 or JC Considine 781-338-3112
NAEP Writing Results Place Massachusetts Third Nationwide
Gender Gap Prompts Call for Renewed Focus on the Achievement of Boys
MALDEN
- Massachusetts' eighth graders scored third in the nation on a national writing assessment in 2007, but girls significantly outscored their male classmates, prompting education officials to call for further attention to be paid to gender gaps. According to National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) results released Thursday, the Commonwealth's eighth graders scored an average of 167 on the writing assessment, significantly higher than the national average of 154. In all, 46 percent of the Massachusetts 8th graders scored at or above the Proficient level on the grade 8 NAEP Writing test, well above the national average of 31 percent. Girls scored significantly higher than boys on the assessment: 60 percent of girls scored at or above Proficient, as compared to just 32 percent of their male classmates. This gap was evident when the test was previously administered in 2002 and 1998. Nationally, 20 percent of boys performed at or above Proficient, as compared to 41 percent of girls. "I'm happy to see that once again Massachusetts as at the head of the pack, but the performance gaps reflected in this report are of deep concern," said Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Chairman Paul Reville. "The gender gap in particular is a growing issue nationally because as the numbers show, our boys are falling behind in reading and writing. It is our responsibility to provide all students – regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, or income – with the right combination of services and support to succeed in our schools. Clearly, we have much work to do in closing these gaps." Acting Elementary and Secondary Education Commissioner Jeffrey Nellhaus agreed. "Writing is a critical life skill and it is unacceptable for this to be a problem area for any of our students," he said. "We need to reassess how we are both teaching and testing writing to ensure that every student gets the skills, practice and expertise they need to do well in school, college and in their future careers." In 2007, Massachusetts was outscored by Connecticut (172) and New Jersey (175), but scored higher than students in all other participating states. Writing scores were last reported in 2002, when the state's eighth graders tied for first with Connecticut, Vermont and Ohio. Other findings include:
The percent of students scoring at or above Proficient in 2007 was higher than in 1998 but statistically unchanged from the 2002 administration of the grade 8 Writing assessment: In 2007, 46 percent of eighth graders tested scored at or above Proficient, as did 42 percent in 2002 and 31 percent in 1998.
The average scaled score of Massachusetts eighth graders in writing in 2007 was 167, statistically unchanged from 163 in 2002 and significantly higher than the 1998 average of 155.
White students outscored black and Hispanic students in Massachusetts in 2007. Fifty-two percent of white students in Massachusetts scored at or above Proficient on the grade 8 NAEP writing test, compared to 19 percent of black students and 16 percent of Hispanic students.
54 percent of student not eligible for free or reduced price lunch scored at or above Proficient, as compared to 21 percent of students tested who do qualify for free or reduced price lunch.
NAEP, also known as "The Nation's Report Card," is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what America's students know and can do in core subjects. NAEP assesses representative samples of students in all 50 states and reports state-level results at grades 4 and 8. More than 3,400 grade 8 Massachusetts public school students from 135 schools participated in the 50-minute NAEP Writing test in 2007. They were assessed on narrative, informative, and persuasive writing. Each student selected to take the assessment had 25 minutes each to respond to two prompts, which required them to write essays, letters, and stories for a variety of audiences. In 2005 Massachusetts' 4th and 8th graders ranked first on the reading exam and tied for first in Math, making Massachusetts the first state ever to rank first on all four NAEP exams in one year. In 2007 Massachusetts 4th and 8th graders did it again: 4th graders ranked first nationwide on the reading and math exams. The same year our eighth graders ranked first in math and tied for first in reading with Montana, New Jersey and Vermont. Additional information on NAEP is available on the Department's Web site at:
www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/natl-intl/naep
, and on the Nation's Report Card Web site at:
www.nationsreportcard.gov
.
Last Updated: April 3, 2008