Security Portal
|
School Profiles
Administration and Finance
Accounting and Auditing
Chapter 70 Program
Chapter 74 Nonresident Tuition
Charter Finance and Enrollment
DESE Budget
Federal Grant Programs
Food and Nutrition
Grants/Funding Opportunities
Inter-District School Choice
Regional Districts
School Buildings
School Finance Regulations
Special Ed. Circuit Breaker
Transportation
Commissioner's Office
Back to School
Commissioner's Update
Special Advisories
Strategic Plan
Superintendents' Checklist
District Support
Accountability Lists, Materials, and Tools
Approved Special Education Schools
Boston Public Schools Systemic Improvement Plan (SIP)
Chronically Underperforming Schools and Districts
Data and Accountability
District Review Documentation
District Review Reports
Federal Reports
Language Access
Leadership and Governance (Toolkit)
Leading Educational Access Project (LEAP)
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS)
Public School Monitoring
School and District Profiles
School and District Report Cards
Special Education
Special Education in Institutional Settings
Statewide System of Support
Student Opportunity Act
Educational Options
Adult and Community Learning Services
Alternative Education
Career Technical Education (CTE)
Charter Schools
College Career, and Technical Education
Commonwealth Virtual Schools
Dropout Prevention and Reengagement
Early College
Educational Collaboratives
Family Portal
High School Equivalency (HSE)
Home Schooling
Innovation Career Pathways
Inter-District School Choice
Mass Academy of Math and Science at WPI
METCO
Problem Resolution System
Public School Districts
Recovery High Schools
School Finder
School Redesign
Student and Family Support
Instructional Support
Acceleration Roadmap
Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Practices
CURATE
Educator Effectiveness
Educator Evaluation
Educator Licensure
Educator Preparation
Educator Recognition
English Learner Education
Equitable Access
Induction and Mentoring
Instructional Materials
Learning Standards
Literacy and Humanities
Mass Literacy
MTEL
PAL
Professional Development
Professional Learning
RETELL
Social and Emotional Learning
STEM
Talent Guide
Teacher Leadership
World Languages
Kaleidoscope Collective
What is Deeper Learning?
Planning for Deeper Learning
Legal
Arbitration Awards
Federal Laws
Legal Advisories
Litigation Reports
State Laws
State Regulations
Planning and Research
Planning for Success
Research and Evaluation
Resource Allocation
Strategic Initiatives
DEI Policies and Practices at DESE
Diverse Workforce
Equitable Student Access
Student Assessment
ACCESS for ELLs
AP Subsidy Program
Graduation Requirements
John and Abigail Adams Scholarship
MCAS
MCAS Accessibility and Accommodations
MCAS Alternate Assessment
MCAS Grade-Level and Competency Portfolio
National/International Tests
Parent/Guardian Information
Performance Appeals
Stanley Z. Koplik Award
Training Opportunities
Why Testing Matters
COVID-19 Information
Board of Education
News and Media
Data and Accountability
Family Portal
Educators and Administrators
Public Awareness Campaigns
Most Requested
Licensure
Learning Standards
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
MTEL
Most Requested:
Licensure
Learning Standards
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
MTEL
For Immediate Release
Thursday, November 17, 2016
Contact:
Jacqueline Reis, 781-338-3115
Massachusetts Releases Second Year of Suspension Data
Work to Reduce Suspensions Continues with Professional Learning Network of Districts
MALDEN
- The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education today released its second annual analysis and report of student discipline data as required by state
regulations
that went into effect on July 1, 2014.
Overall, the 2015-16 data that schools reported were similar to that from the 2014-15 school year, with the percentage of students who were suspended at least once rising slightly from 4.1 percent to 4.3 percent. In 2015-16, as in 2014-15, there were approximately 10,000 fewer students suspended compared to before a
state law
took effect that was aimed at reducing the amount of learning time students miss due to suspensions or expulsions. Almost half of the offenses in both 2014-15 and 2015-16 were in the non-drug, non-violent category, and ESE is considering creating sub-categories within that group to help pinpoint why students are being suspended.
"While orderly learning environments are essential, I am concerned with schools that over-rely on or disproportionately use suspensions," said Elementary and Secondary Education Commissioner Mitchell Chester. "The Department will continue to work with districts to find effective alternatives to suspension and to identify and address instances in which suspensions are used disproportionately."
Both national and Massachusetts data show that African American/black students, Hispanic/Latino students and students with disabilities are suspended at greater rates than students overall, and research has found that suspended students are more likely to drop out. The suspension rate for Massachusetts English language learners in 2015-16 was 5.4 percent (compared to 5 percent in 2014-15), for students who are economically disadvantaged it was 7.7 percent (compared to 7.2 percent in 2014-15), and for students with disabilities it was 8.3 percent (compared to 8 percent in 2014-15). The suspension rate for female students was 2.5 percent (the same as in 2014-15), while the rate was 5.9 percent for males (compared to 5.7 percent in 2014-15). Statewide differences by race/ethnicity are also of great concern: the suspension rate for African American/black students (9.3 percent, compared 9 percent in 2014-15) was more than three times that of white students (2.7 percent, the same as in 2014-15), and the rate for Hispanic/Latino students (7.7 percent, compared to 7.4 percent in 2014-15) was more than twice the rate of white students.
At the state level, ESE continues to work with the
Rethinking Discipline Professional Learning Network
that was created in June to collaborate with schools and districts to reduce the inappropriate or excessive use of long-term suspensions and expulsions. The network includes more than three dozen schools and districts that were identified based on their previously submitted data. The Department is in the process of further analyzing the 2015-2016 data to inform the next annual determinations.
Additionally, during the past several weeks, ESE's Problem Resolution System Unit, in collaboration with staff from other offices at ESE, hosted a series of four "Sharing Solutions" trainings regarding discipline, bullying and restraint regulations, among other topics. The effort reached 130 school districts and the state's 26 collaboratives.
At the individual school level, changes in discipline statistics should be examined carefully. While there are several areas of concern, it is also possible that reporting errors at the district level during the first year of implementation (2014-15) may have led to significant percentage jumps when incidents were more consistently reported in 2015-16. Percentage changes should also be considered in conjunction with the number of students disciplined; as always, even small changes can produce large percentage differences.
School leaders in Massachusetts and across the country have found that supports and strategies that reinforce positive behavior, include conflict resolution, and improve classroom management not only reduce suspensions but also promote school safety, decrease the need for out-of-class discipline referrals and improve academic success.
Data from the 2015-2016 school year are available through the
Student Discipline
and the
Student Discipline Days Missed
reports on the ESE website.
For more information and resources related to student discipline, see
Student Discipline Resources and Information
.
###
Last Updated: November 17, 2016