Security Portal
|
School Profiles
Administration and Finance
Accounting and Auditing
Chapter 70 Program
Chapter 74 Nonresident Tuition
Charter Finance and Enrollment
DESE Budget
Federal Grant Programs
Food and Nutrition
Grants/Funding Opportunities
Inter-District School Choice
Regional Districts
School Buildings
School Finance Regulations
Special Ed. Circuit Breaker
Transportation
Commissioner's Office
Back to School
Commissioner's Update
Special Advisories
Strategic Plan
Superintendents' Checklist
District Support
Accountability Lists, Materials, and Tools
Approved Special Education Schools
Boston Public Schools Systemic Improvement Plan (SIP)
Chronically Underperforming Schools and Districts
Data and Accountability
District Review Documentation
District Review Reports
Federal Reports
Language Access
Leadership and Governance (Toolkit)
Leading Educational Access Project (LEAP)
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS)
Public School Monitoring
School and District Profiles
School and District Report Cards
Special Education
Special Education in Institutional Settings
Statewide System of Support
Student Opportunity Act
Educational Options
Adult and Community Learning Services
Alternative Education
Career Technical Education (CTE)
Charter Schools
College Career, and Technical Education
Commonwealth Virtual Schools
Dropout Prevention and Reengagement
Early College
Educational Collaboratives
Family Portal
High School Equivalency (HSE)
Home Schooling
Innovation Career Pathways
Inter-District School Choice
Mass Academy of Math and Science at WPI
METCO
Problem Resolution System
Public School Districts
Recovery High Schools
School Finder
School Redesign
Student and Family Support
Instructional Support
Acceleration Roadmap
Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Practices
CURATE
Educator Effectiveness
Educator Evaluation
Educator Licensure
Educator Preparation
Educator Recognition
English Learner Education
Equitable Access
Induction and Mentoring
Instructional Materials
Learning Standards
Literacy and Humanities
Mass Literacy
MTEL
PAL
Professional Development
Professional Learning
RETELL
Social and Emotional Learning
STEM
Talent Guide
Teacher Leadership
World Languages
Kaleidoscope Collective
What is Deeper Learning?
Planning for Deeper Learning
Legal
Arbitration Awards
Federal Laws
Legal Advisories
Litigation Reports
State Laws
State Regulations
Planning and Research
Planning for Success
Research and Evaluation
Resource Allocation
Strategic Initiatives
DEI Policies and Practices at DESE
Diverse Workforce
Equitable Student Access
Student Assessment
ACCESS for ELLs
AP Subsidy Program
Graduation Requirements
John and Abigail Adams Scholarship
MCAS
MCAS Accessibility and Accommodations
MCAS Alternate Assessment
MCAS Grade-Level and Competency Portfolio
National/International Tests
Parent/Guardian Information
Performance Appeals
Stanley Z. Koplik Award
Training Opportunities
Why Testing Matters
COVID-19 Information
Board of Education
News and Media
Data and Accountability
Family Portal
Educators and Administrators
Public Awareness Campaigns
Most Requested
Licensure
Learning Standards
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
MTEL
Most Requested:
Licensure
Learning Standards
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
MTEL
For Immediate Release
Tuesday, March 15, 2016
Contact:
Jacqueline Reis, 781-338-3115
Massachusetts Posts Bid Document for Next-Generation MCAS
MALDEN
- The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education today posted the
request for responses (RFR) for an assessment vendor
to help the state build a next-generation Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS). The vendor's role will be similar to that of previous vendors that have worked with the state to develop, score and report results from the current MCAS. The posting follows the
Board of Elementary and Secondary Education's November 17, 2015 vote
to move forward with a next-generation MCAS and update the state's math and English language arts standards. The Department has been
convening workgroups
to inform the development of the assessment and is gathering suggestions to improve the state's learning standards. As outlined in the Board's vote, the next-generation MCAS will move the state toward computer-based testing and will incorporate existing MCAS items, items that Massachusetts and other states developed through the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and items unique to the next-generation assessment. "MCAS has served the Commonwealth well but is now in its 19th year; it is time for an upgrade. The RFR process will allow Massachusetts to help maintain its leadership position nationally with a first-class, next-generation assessment system," said Elementary and Secondary Education Commissioner Mitchell D. Chester. The RFR is written with as much flexibility as possible to allow for input from the ongoing work of advisory groups and the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education's Assessment Subcommittee. The RFR calls for:
The next-generation English language arts and math MCAS to be given starting in spring 2017 to students in grades 3-8;
The grade 10 English language arts and math assessments to likely transition to similar test designs as early as 2018 while the existing MCAS remains a graduation requirement through the class of 2019 (the existing MCAS will continue to be offered as a retest through at least 2021);
Science and technology/engineering testing to transition to alignment with the
recently approved frameworks
and move to a next-generation, computer-based assessment over the next several years; and
Phasing in computer-based testing over two years in order to meet the Board's goal of statewide computer-based testing by 2019.
The RFR continues many of the practices that have made MCAS a highly regarded test. For instance:
Review committees of Massachusetts educators will assist with item development and review test quality throughout the development process;
The MCAS Service Center, overseen by ESE staff, will deliver timely, well-informed customer service;
Massachusetts educators and ESE staff will continue to determine test administration procedures and policies on accommodations; and
The policy on item release will remain as similar to the existing item release policy as possible based on agreements with item developers that govern item use and public release.
The RFR also addresses factors related to shifting to computer-based assessments. For instance, the RFR requires a well-tested, user-friendly, computer-based testing platform and assessment management system. Potential contractors must show that they have had proven success with computer-based testing in statewide assessments. In addition, the system must have a computerized toolkit and a drawing tool to ensure students can easily complete math and science tests on a computer. Another component of the RFR asks interested vendors to describe their capacity and expertise to develop and administer a reinstated history and social science testing program, something the state has not had since the most recent version was suspended in 2009. All bids are due on May 6, 2016, and ESE expects to award a contract in time for a mid-summer start. ###
Last Updated: March 15, 2016