Security Portal
|
School Profiles
Administration and Finance
Accounting and Auditing
Chapter 70 Program
Chapter 74 Nonresident Tuition
Charter Finance and Enrollment
DESE Budget
Federal Grant Programs
Food and Nutrition
Grants/Funding Opportunities
Inter-District School Choice
Regional Districts
School Buildings
School Finance Regulations
Special Ed. Circuit Breaker
Transportation
Commissioner's Office
Back to School
Commissioner's Update
Special Advisories
Strategic Plan
Superintendents' Checklist
District Support
Accountability Lists, Materials, and Tools
Approved Special Education Schools
Boston Public Schools Systemic Improvement Plan (SIP)
Chronically Underperforming Schools and Districts
Data and Accountability
District Review Documentation
District Review Reports
Federal Reports
Language Access
Leadership and Governance (Toolkit)
Leading Educational Access Project (LEAP)
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS)
Public School Monitoring
School and District Profiles
School and District Report Cards
Special Education
Special Education in Institutional Settings
Statewide System of Support
Student Opportunity Act
Educational Options
Adult and Community Learning Services
Alternative Education
Career Technical Education (CTE)
Charter Schools
College Career, and Technical Education
Commonwealth Virtual Schools
Dropout Prevention and Reengagement
Early College
Educational Collaboratives
Family Portal
High School Equivalency (HSE)
Home Schooling
Innovation Career Pathways
Inter-District School Choice
Mass Academy of Math and Science at WPI
METCO
Problem Resolution System
Public School Districts
Recovery High Schools
School Finder
School Redesign
Student and Family Support
Instructional Support
Acceleration Roadmap
Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Practices
CURATE
Educator Effectiveness
Educator Evaluation
Educator Licensure
Educator Preparation
Educator Recognition
English Learner Education
Equitable Access
Induction and Mentoring
Instructional Materials
Learning Standards
Literacy and Humanities
Mass Literacy
MTEL
PAL
Professional Development
Professional Learning
RETELL
Social and Emotional Learning
STEM
Talent Guide
Teacher Leadership
World Languages
Kaleidoscope Collective
What is Deeper Learning?
Planning for Deeper Learning
Legal
Arbitration Awards
Federal Laws
Legal Advisories
Litigation Reports
State Laws
State Regulations
Planning and Research
Planning for Success
Research and Evaluation
Resource Allocation
Strategic Initiatives
DEI Policies and Practices at DESE
Diverse Workforce
Equitable Student Access
Student Assessment
ACCESS for ELLs
AP Subsidy Program
Graduation Requirements
John and Abigail Adams Scholarship
MCAS
MCAS Accessibility and Accommodations
MCAS Alternate Assessment
MCAS Grade-Level and Competency Portfolio
National/International Tests
Parent/Guardian Information
Performance Appeals
Stanley Z. Koplik Award
Training Opportunities
Why Testing Matters
COVID-19 Information
Board of Education
News and Media
Data and Accountability
Family Portal
Educators and Administrators
Public Awareness Campaigns
Most Requested
Licensure
Learning Standards
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
MTEL
Most Requested:
Licensure
Learning Standards
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
MTEL
For Immediate Release
Monday, September 21, 2015
Contact:
Jacqueline Reis 781-338-3115
State Releases Statewide MCAS Results and Preliminary PARCC Results
MCAS results improve in most areas, preliminary PARCC results highlight challenges
Malden
- The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education today released statewide MCAS results for 10
th
graders, statewide results for the 202,000 students in grades 3–8 who took MCAS, and partial preliminary results for students who took PARCC. As part of the state's two-year test drive of PARCC, districts chose whether to give PARCC or MCAS in spring 2015, with the exception of the 10
th
grade MCAS, which remains a graduation requirement. Districts that chose PARCC had the option of administering it by computer or with paper and pencil. The PARCC results shared this evening reflect only those students who took PARCC on a computer, or roughly 59 percent of the Massachusetts students who took PARCC. The Board of Elementary and Secondary Education is expected to vote in November on whether to switch from MCAS to PARCC. "I would like to thank all the students, teachers and administrators whose experiences will help the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education to determine whether to adopt PARCC," said Elementary and Secondary Education Commissioner Mitchell D. Chester. "I am pleased to see the MCAS scores reflect continued progress in narrowing some of the achievement gaps that persist between groups of students. We also have our first look at partial PARCC scores, which will ultimately help establish a baseline for comparison with other PARCC states and with our own progress over time, should the board choose to adopt PARCC as our statewide assessment." Overall, the percent of students scoring Proficient or higher on MCAS rose in most subjects in most grade levels compared to 2014. Also noteworthy is the fact that between 2007 and 2015, the gaps between white students and their African American/black and Hispanic or Latino peers narrowed in all grades in both English language arts and math. (The baseline year for the full grades 3–8 testing regimen is 2007.) The preliminary PARCC results showed that in most grades, students who took PARCC math and English language arts tests on a computer were less likely to score in the "meeting expectations" range than MCAS students were to score Proficient or above. In other words, student achievement on PARCC for those who took the test on a computer appears to have been lower than for students who took MCAS. The exception was in grade 4, where the percent of students who scored in the "meeting expectations" range on a computerized PARCC test and the percent of students who scored Proficient or above on MCAS were virtually the same. The high school PARCC results are not representative of the state as a whole. Relatively few Massachusetts high schools volunteered to give PARCC tests in grades 9 and 11, because of the 10
th
grade MCAS requirement, and only a subset of those who used high school PARCC tests did so on a computer. Commissioner Chester and Education Secretary Jim Peyser cautioned Board members about reading too much into the preliminary results. "This early report on PARCC results is preliminary and incomplete and therefore cannot yet be directly compared to this year's MCAS results," Secretary Peyser said. "I look forward to seeing the complete results as they become available."
Spring 2015 statewide MCAS results
Grade and subject
Category
% Warning/failing
% Needs improvement
% Proficient
% Advanced
3 ELA
9
32
49
11
3 math
11
18
39
32
4 ELA
14
33
43
11
4 math
13
40
29
19
5 ELA
9
20
48
23
5 math
12
21
32
35
5 science
13
37
35
16
6 ELA
10
19
52
19
6 math
14
24
32
30
7 ELA
8
23
60
9
7 math
23
26
30
20
8 ELA
6
14
54
26
8 math
17
23
31
29
8 science
18
40
39
3
10 ELA
3
6
42
49
10 math
8
13
25
53
10 science
5
23
44
27
Preliminary Massachusetts PARCC Results from Computer-Based Tests
Grade and subject
Level
Meeting expectations
1
2
3
4
5
3 ELA
13%
17%
23%
43%
4%
3 math
7
17
25
42
9
4 ELA
6
13
26
42
13
4 math
5
19
28
43
5
5 ELA
6
14
25
49
6
5 math
7
17
28
40
8
6 ELA
6
13
27
45
9
6 math
6
16
29
42
7
7 ELA
8
12
23
37
20
7 math
5
18
32
39
6
8 ELA
8
12
23
44
13
8 math
13
19
22
39
7
9 ELA*
23
22
24
25
6
11 ELA*
23
21
20
27
9
Algebra I*
14
26
21
35
4
Geometry*
8
28
37
26
1
Algebra II*
47
24
16
12
1
Integrated Math I*
13
19
15
38
15
Integrated Math II*
39
26
22
13
0
*
While more than half of Massachusetts school districts that serve students in grades 3–8 gave PARCC in the spring, far fewer districts volunteered to use the PARCC high school tests, because the 10th grade MCAS is still a graduation requirement. In addition, some eighth grade students took Algebra I tests instead of eighth grade PARCC math tests.
Highlights of 2015 MCAS Results
Statewide MCAS results showed that 91 percent of 10
th
graders scored Proficient or higher in English language arts, 79 percent in mathematics, and 72 percent in science and technology/engineering (STE). Student achievement statewide improved on 11 of the 17 MCAS tests administered in 2015. Results included a small increase in third grade English language arts, but those scores have been essentially flat over the past six years. Other statewide results include:
88 percent of 10
th
graders last spring (class of 2017) met the state's minimum testing requirements to earn a high school diploma on their first attempt by scoring Needs Improvement or higher in English language arts, mathematics and science and technology/engineering. That is the same percentage as last year (class of 2016) and in 2013 (class of 2015). Eleven years ago, when the graduation requirement first took effect with the class of 2003, only 68 percent met the requirements on their first try.
Between 2007 and 2015, the achievement gap in English language between white students and African American/black students and between white students and Hispanic or Latino students narrowed in all grades. The greatest gap narrowing in English language arts for African American/black students and Hispanic or Latino students occurred in 10th grade, where it narrowed by 19 percentage points and 18 percentage points respectively. That represents a 63 percent and 53 percent narrowing of the gap respectively.
In mathematics between 2007 and 2015, the achievement gap between white students and African American/black students and between white students and Hispanic or Latino students narrowed in all grades. Among African American/black students, the greatest narrowing occurred in grade 4, with an 8 percentage point reduction in the gap. Among Hispanic or Latino students, the greatest narrowing occurred in grade 3, where it narrowed by 11 percentage points.
A note about representative samples
The fact that districts chose which assessment to give to grades 3–8 in spring 2015 meant that the student body in districts that chose MCAS and the student body in the districts that chose PARCC were not representative of the state as a whole in terms of students' prior achievement, income level, race, English proficiency and level of disability. To make the results meaningful for the state as a whole, ESE is using
large representative samples
of the groups that more closely mirror the state's actual enrollment primarily in terms of prior achievement and secondly with respect to demographics, English proficiency and level of disability. For instance, the grades 3–8 data for MCAS presented in this release includes the results of about 74 percent of the students in grades 3–8 who took MCAS, not the entire universe of test-takers. When district and school results are released later this week, those will include all of the tested students in a given district or school. For more information on MCAS, visit
http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/
. For more information on PARCC, visit
www.doe.mass.edu/parcc
. ###
Last Updated: September 21, 2015